Bibliocad

Conditions for send files

About our search for works to be published.

• Our search is oriented to works that by their nature can be applicable in similar situations, either in direct form and without changes, or indirectly and modified, and whose value gives them sustenance.
• Blocks and/or symbols ready to insert in any situation, only if they are accompanied by their corresponding description and form of use. Photographs with opacity map for their use in renders and photorealism.
• Lisp routines or programs, which create drawings or calculations where their way of use and description are properly documented, and can be used for free.
• Information for professional use.

Very important:

• Priority will be given to the material which can fit into categories with few published works, or in non-existent categories with a close relationship to the Bibliocad thematic.

Selection criteria:

To evaluate the publication of the sent works, the following conditions will be considered.

• Non-replicable work, which by their singularity cannot be utilized in other situations.
• Non-editable work by electronic media.
• Renders.
• Dispatches that do not respect the thematic of the site. In Bibliocad, we are focused on the compilation of information for professional use in Architecture, Engineering, Design and the Building Industry in general.
  This compilation attempts to be an extended Library for on-line consultation, that groups graphical material in vectorial format, written, general information and software for direct application to design and management.
• Repeated files that already appear in the data base.
• Extracted works from similar Web sites or libraries.
• Works which have not been authorized to be published by their authors.
• Poorly presented drawings that do not fulfill the minimum requirements of the rules of art.
• Conceptually erroneous works, badly documented or incomplete, that do not allow the clarity and comprehension or unusable because of parts missing.
• Works which do not adjust to the norms of presentation (inclusion of several archives in 1 zip, invalid extensions, corrupt archives, incompatible versions, or encripted) that complicate the publication process.
• Works not fitted to the search thematic and requirements of Bibliocad. Our search is oriented to works that by their nature can be applicable in similar situations, either in direct form and without changes, or indirectly and modified and whose value gives them sustenance.
  Blocks and/or symbols ready to insert in any situation, only if they are accompanied by their corresponding description and form of use. Photographs with opacity map for their use in renders and photorealism.
  Lisp routines or programs, which create drawings or calculations where their way of use and description are properly documented, and can be used for free.
  Information for professional use.
• Collections of packed blocks in a single file without any description of each one or of their way of use.

The single presence of some of these conditions can cause the disqualification to be published. .

ABOUT THE FILES EVALUATION PROCESS

The revision process consists of 2 instances. This can take up to 60 days depending on the quantity of work to be reviewed.

• Instance 1 of revision
  One first ocular inspection allows us to detect the dispatches that do not have interest for us to be published. This does not mean necessarily that they are poor, may be subjects on which we have sufficient dispatches, or that by his plainness it does not have sense to publish them, that they do not have a possible use in another similar situation, or that are definitively outside the thematic of the site. In these cases the printed reference in your dispatches tracing list, is 'Not to be published'.
• Instance 2 of revision
  This instance implies a more refined work on the remaining files. In case these files are rejected, it is let now by email to the sender (it is important to maintain the mailbox updated in our data base so that the mail arrives succesfully) and the cause of rejection is printed in your dispatches tracing list.
• Publication
  The authors of the finally published works, will be informed by email (it is important to maintain the mailbox updated in our data base so that the mail arrives succesfully). We print also in the dispatches tracing list the detail of adjudged days as credit to each sent and published work. The obtained credit consists in days of access, and they begin to count from the beginning of the following session from the publication date. While the user does not initiate session, the obtained days as credit, will be maintained in latency without expiration. If eventually there were more published works, the obtained credit will be added on which already it has adjudged, even being in latency.

ABOUT THE CREDIT OBTAINED IF YOUR FILES ARE PUBLISHED

• The credit obtained by the published works, will be placed in the account used by the user to make the dispatch.
• The obtained credit will become in days of access as a VIP user, beginning to count them from the immediate following session to the publication.
  While the user does not initiate session, the days obtained as credit, will be maintained in latency without expiration.
  Once the session has been initiated, you will not be able to interrupt until it has not been totally consumed. If eventually there were more published works, the obtained credit will be added on which already it has adjudged, even being in latency.
• The adjudged time as credit depends on the nature of the work. Here you have, only as an example, the following values:
  
  • Project with technical documentation - 30 days or more
  • Incomplete project - 15 days or more
  • Constructive detail of general application - between 7 and 15 days
  • Textures and images for renders - 2 days
  • Simple symbols and drawings - 2 days
  • Texts, lists and other type of works - variable